Act for America

Richard Richardson of the local Mission Viejo California Tea Party organization, publicized an ACT FOR AMERICA organization meeting. Richard Richardson is associated with the Tea Party in Southern California. The Tea Party opposes the oppressive tax regime of the US. The plan for Restoring Americana Greatness is a natural political fit with the Tea Party, as both seek more liberty and freedom in the US from the federal government. It was an honor and a pleasure to meet with Richard Richardson. We plan to meet again December 2nd 2015 at the Foothill Family Church in Lake Forest to hear Franklin Graham speak. It is a personal pleasure to meet and mingle with Christians having a liberty and freedom political perspective.  Being inherently reclusive and very private particularly over the last decade studying military science, geopolitics and markets, it is actually wonderful to travel about the country and meet people, as it reinforces desires to not give up on humanity.

On November 9 2015, in Mission Viejo California, a lecture was given by Colonel Jon Gold concerning the spread of militant Islam. Jon indicated that the spread of militant Islam is a preplanned operation to conquer the world and impose Sharia Law world wide, that Sharia Law is contrary to the Constitution and founding father principles, that preaching Sharia law implementation in the US is inherently seditious, and particularly, that the invasion of Europe by Muslims currently in process now is part of the plan. The lecture contained graphic images, and impressed upon the meeting the inherent brutality and intolerance with which militant Islam treats people of other faiths as the means of spreading Islam, including violence against Christians, Jews, Buddhist, Hindus, Atheists, with murder, terror, gangland violence, and rape on a grand preplanned scale. It was emphasized that moderate peaceful Muslims have not reformed Islam, as did other religions, seeking tolerance, mutual respect and peaceful coexistence, and such moderate peaceful Muslims are largely irrelevant in stopping the spread of militant Islam.

While the lecture on its face was extreme in its presentation and graphic in nature, there appears to be sufficient evidence as to it veracity, and is certainly not irrational. It was asserted the last two US Presidents, Bush and Obama have open the doors to the US to Muslims sowing the seeds of domestic violence and sedition against the US Constitution. Of particular interest was a reference to President Putin and Russia to be inherently willing to meet militant Islamic violence with violence to protect Russian Nationals. Jon indicated that Militant Islam and International Terrorism present a global problem. Jon indicated that one method of conquering the world was through False Flag refugee invasion with high birth rates, and that the plan to conquer the world in the name of Islam is a multigenerational plan, based upon violence and breeding.

Braveheart The problem with Scotland

On November 13th 2015, two days after Colonel Jon Long gave his presentation in Mission Viejo California, in what appears to be the deadliest terror attacks in France in many decades, at least 128 people were feared killed in Paris on Friday night as a series of deadly attacks was staged across the capital city. Some reports say another 200 were injured, as many as 80 seriously.

In the mean time, Merkel of Germany said that the refugee relocation in Europe was utterly a failure.

FROM LP NATIONAL, December 15, 2015

Dear Muslim Republicans,
I share your outrage and hurt at Donald Trump’s recent comments and policy suggestions about Muslims. I share your outrage and hurt that he still is polling well among Republicans. I share your outrage and hurt that we should even have to discuss such matters. But obviously we do.
Freedom of religion is one of our most sacred American values, protected by our Constitution. Never should someone be disparaged, profiled, or have their rights infringed upon because of their religious faith. Republicans like to talk a good game about our Constitution but, clearly, many are making an exception when it comes to religious liberty. This is quite sad and it is this kind of double standard that has caused so many liberty-loving people to leave the Republican Party and find a better home in the Libertarian Party.

If you have not previously considered the Libertarian Party, I encourage you to do so now. We are an extremely diverse group of people who are passionate about liberty…about all rights, of all people, all the time. We do not denigrate or disparage any group.  We respect the humanity of all people and their rights to make their own decisions about their lives. Simply put: Libertarianism is the idea that every person has the right to pursue happiness in any way they wish as long as it doesn't hurt people or take their stuff.
I know many of your families have fled repressive regimes abroad in search of peace, prosperity, and liberty in the United States. I hope you have found good things here. No country is perfect and recent weeks have reminded us of that. But I maintain that, despite our imperfections, the United States is one of the best places on the planet for liberty-loving people. Our Constitution does protect your rights, and it will continue to. And Libertarians nationwide always will stand with you also, advocating your rights and the rights of all people to live freely.
Friend, if you find that the Republican Party continues to disparage you, please consider a home in the Libertarian Party where we respect all rights, of all people, all the time.
Nicholas Sarwark
Chair, Libertarian National Committee

There is then the problem becoming focused. On one hand, Trump is fear mongering to pander republicans who believe that Muslim immigration should be halted to protect the homeland. The Libertarian Party embraces all people, regardless of national origin or creed, two of the equal protection aspects in the US Constitution. It is true that the Koran, written 1000 years ago, was based upon the spread of Islam by the sword of Mohamed. Muslims do have in a tiny percentage a brutal ideology towards Jihad and Infidels and the spread of Islam, while the vast majority of Muslims are peaceful and tolerant of others. The United Sates is a melting pot. All new comers should assimilate into Americana, of liberty, democracy and free speech. The goal is not to ban Muslims, but to assimilate them, as good citizens, for those who want to come to the US, into Americana culture, so as to teach Constitution, Liberty, Freedom, to make Muslims love America for what it is, a land of liberty. Trump bombastic pronouncements do not solve problems, but are counter-productive to solving ethic and religious problems, and are inherently divisive, pandering and fear mongering, sowing seeds of social strife. The better approach is to screen violent persons, but welcome, teach and assimilate those who want to live in the land of freedom and liberty.   

There is an extreme element in Islam, the extent to which it actually exists is debatable of course. All Muslims I have personally known, are stand up folks. US may be playing Islam, the Jihad, Sharia law, Shia-Sunnie feud, as a ploy to weaken Russia, the supposed global bad guy. We just dont know, what intel BHO gets, the presentation of it from a biased security perspective, and how he reacts to it. There are legitimate concerns about terrorism and sedition against the US Constitution, just as there are legitimate concerns about ignoble foreign policy and mass invasion of constitutional rights. It all plays together in the intel minds. Again, the problem is lack of clarity at state and intelligent police actions.

This Muslim Terrorism concern is real to some extent, and can not be dismissed totally. While Trump’s ban has a basis, it lacks intelligent methods of accomplishing desired results, ie protecting the home land, and insults 600m world wide and trample on domestic rights and immigrations channels. This issue raises the NSA concern, and their drag net across America, data mining, for example, the phone record collection process violating peoples rights of privacy as an unwarranted intrusion. While I certainly do not know the full extent of current collection technology capabilities, it can be quickly determined, and probable cause safe guards injected, through technology algorithms, so as to minimize invasions of privacy.

The communications network is vast, comprising of mail, phone, email, FB, twitter, googlesites, inter alia. This network can be quantized and mapped upon a population of 300m in the states as potential communications nodes. Bad guys identified can be monitored for extraordinary communications, which spreads into the US communications space, providing by recurrence, a weighted communications nodal map, for isolating and identifying domestic threats, with sufficient probable cause, yet minimize gross privacy invasions, yet provide a technology communications means of identifying real threats in the US. The engineering mind, applied to politics, in view of legal concepts of legitimate police actions can fashion reasonable technology monitoring means of providing domestic protection, yet minimizes privacy invasions.

The problem is the mind set of DC, from one perspective, that is, seeking protection at all costs, on one hand, but without a constant regard to constitutional rights, on the other hand, but what else would you expect from a totalitarian socialistic fascist government that sits in DC enslaving us all as tax mules, perpetual debtor and state dependents, so as to enrich the top 1%?